spectratg
Member
- Location
- Adamstown, MD
Some would argue that there is no intelligent life on this planet either.As a side note, I do believe there is intelligent life out there besides us.
Some would argue that there is no intelligent life on this planet either.As a side note, I do believe there is intelligent life out there besides us.
Basic life is the result of chemical compounds that come together through natural processes. Given a nurturing environment, it just happens. Once the basics are in place, anything can happen. I've heard it said that it only happened once on earth, but we don't know that. I think a safer claim would be that it only needed to happen once.Considering life sprang up on Earth, would we not have expected it to start in at least one other location in the last 14 billion years of the universe?
species arize like internet startups and all end up like Blockbuster video stores.
A friend of mine related a story about missing time when she was about 10 or 11. She was at a parade and left early to head to her grandmother's house. She crossed a field to get there. When she got to her grandmother's house, her mother and grandmother were frantic. Some others were there as were the police. Apparently they had been searching for her. I forgot how many hours had elapsed, but in her mind, she had gone straight to her grandmother's house.These things exist. I've seen them. My buddy and I went missing an hour once back in the '70s.
I had a lot more than just one "missing" hours back in the 70s. Never occurred to me that it might have been aliens...These things exist. I've seen them. My buddy and I went missing an hour once back in the '70s.
I just don't believe that aliens have ever come here. I did read books in the past but remain unconvinced. That's just me though.I believe when people "see' things in sky, it's that they are seeing some kind of phenomena. But to leap to conclude the phenomena are space aliens, without dispensing with every conceivable earthly origin, is wishful thinking. People talk about UFOs as if they were verified alien encounters, when UFO means, we don't what the hell that was. And by definition, a UFO can't be an alien encounter then we 'd know what the hell it was. Yet, say, "UFO" and some see green aliens all over the place. That said, I would welcome a scientific examination to determine the origin of phenomena seen in the sky.
Personally, I believe there is other life in the universe, but the odds, are with such huge distances, they'll never get here; nor we, there.
I often wondered why it was always the military or government, who saw something, had proof of it, and refused to reveal it. Yet, in my entire life, and the lives of everyone I have known...no one had ever seen anything that even remotely resembled a UFO, or space alien. This begs the question "are we alone in the universe?"...so far, yes. How can this be??? That's another question, and there is only 1 who can answer that."One of the things that we tangentially hope to be part of this study ... is to help to remove some of the stigma associated with it."
NASA hopes it can help move the study of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) off the scientific fringes and into the mainstream. The agency announced today (June 9) that it has commissioned a panel to investigate UAP, a recent rebranding that is pushing out the more familiar term "unidentified flying object" (UFO). The NASA study will begin this fall, take about nine months to complete and cost no more than $100,000, agency officials said during a call with reporters today. The main goal is to assess the state of the UAP data landscape and how it can be improved going forward.
"The study will focus on identifying available data, how to best collect future data and how NASA can use these data to move the scientific understanding of UAPs forward," Thomas Zurbuchen, the associate administrator for science at NASA headquarters in Washington, said during today's call. Or, in other words, "take a field that is relatively data poor and make it into a field that is much more data rich and therefore worthy of scientific investigation and analysis," he added.
Such work is very much in NASA's bailiwick, Zurbuchen said, noting that the agency's many research priorities cover, among other things, the hunt for alien life, investigating mysterious cosmic objects and phenomena and helping to keep American aircraft safe and secure. (The first "A" in NASA stands for "aeronautics," and UAP could represent a threat to planes and other aerial vehicles.) And, like the U.S. Department of Defense, NASA is not afraid to put its name behind the push to demystify UAP. (The DoD has set up multiple UAP-studying task forces in the past few years, stressing that understanding the phenomena is important for national security purposes.)
"In a traditional type of science environment, talking about some of these issues may be considered kind of selling out or talking about things that are not actual science," Zurbuchen said. "I just really vehemently oppose that. I really believe that the quality of science is not only measured by the outputs that come behind it but also the questions we're willing to tackle with science." Indeed, NASA hopes that the newly announced panel, and the work that it does, will help normalize UAP sightings and research, bringing more and better information into scientists' databases.
"One of the things you might have heard in the congressional hearings a few weeks ago was, there is a great deal of stigma associated with UAP among our naval aviators and in the aviation community," Daniel Evans, assistant deputy associate administrator for research at NASA's Science Mission Directorate, said during today's call. Evans is the NASA official responsible for orchestrating the study, which will be led by astrophysicist David Spergel, president of the Simons Foundation in New York City. "One of the things that we tangentially hope to be part of this study, simply by talking about it in the open, is to help to remove some of the stigma associated with it," Evans added. "That will yield, obviously, increased access to data, more reports, more sightings, et cetera. So that's another thing that we're trying to accomplish with it."
You know there is one school of thought that entities capable of space travel are so much farther advanced than us, that they would not even notice us any more than we would notice an ant when going about our business. Our self-proclaimed "intelligence" could be miniscule compared to other beings in the universe, far below any interest to them. We are insignificant.I'm sure other life exists somewhere else in the universe, but to think that they came here, had a look around, and then left without trying to contact any of us seems a bit far fetched.
We surely would seem primitive to them, but they'd see our planes flying around, and autos and ships and other forms of technology, so they'd recognize an advanced society — even if far behind theirs. If we saw indications of a high level of intelligence in ants, we would try to contact some of them. We do try to communicate with monkeys and dolphins and other animals.You know there is one school of thought that entities capable of space travel are so much farther advanced than us, that they would not even notice us any more than we would notice an ant when going about our business. Our self-proclaimed "intelligence" could be miniscule compared to other beings in the universe, far below any interest to them. We are insignificant.
Unless they would have no motivation to do so; we wouldn't be of any interest to them, being only trivial creatures. Just because we interact with other species on our own planet does not mean that such hypothetical beings would have a similar curiosity about us.We surely would seem primitive to them, but they'd see our planes flying around, and autos and ships and other forms of technology, so they'd recognize an advanced society — even if far behind theirs. If we saw indications of a high level of intelligence in ants, we would try to contact some of them. We do try to communicate with monkeys and dolphins and other animals.
In other words, I doubt aliens would come all that way and not try to communicate with us.
True. Considering the amount of time it would take to get here and the distance it would have to travel, any craft from another solar system would probably not have any living beings on it and might only be here to collect data... perhaps mapping out the galaxy.Unless they would have no motivation to do so; we wouldn't be of any interest to them, being only trivial creatures. Just because we interact with other species on our own planet does not mean that such hypothetical beings would have a similar curiosity about us.
Nice find, Diva! I read the same release. Fascinating stuff!GMA reported that out of 757 sightings within a year, 21 cannot be explained by the Pentagon. But they are not ready to say that the crafts are from extra terrestrial sources. Here is the GMA video report. Starting at 1:42 the former Pentagon head of the unit investigating UFOs gives interesting answers to questions he was asked at a hearing that took place this past week.
https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/...finds-21-alleged-sighting-explained-115890390
NASA hopes new study helps bring UFO research into the mainstream